
How to make follow-up more consistent, more confident, and less exhausting
Aged AR is not only hard because payers are slow.
It’s hard because follow-up is inconsistent.
One person gets a clear answer in two minutes.
Another person spends ten minutes and still leaves with “it’s in process.”
Same payer. Same account type. Different outcome.
That’s not because one person is better.
It’s because the questions were different.
When follow-up relies on memory or personal style, teams end up with uneven notes, uneven results, and a lot of repeat work.
A simple fix is to treat follow-up like a system:
Use verification scripts.
Not robotic scripts.
Just short, repeatable questions that force clarity.
A Verification Script System is a small set of questions your team uses on purpose — so every touch produces the same kind of useful information.
Think of it as a checklist for certainty.
You don’t need ten questions.
Most teams only need three core scripts, used at the right moments:
This is how you reduce uncertainty without adding more work.
Scripts aren’t for beginners.
Scripts are for consistency.
They protect teams from:
They also protect new staff during handoffs, training, and coverage.
The goal is not to sound scripted.
The goal is to ask the questions that move accounts forward.
Use this right after any key submission (appeal, records, corrected claim).
Script:
“Hi, I’m calling to confirm receipt of the documents submitted on (date).
Can you confirm you can see them on your side and that they’re attached to the claim?
Is anything missing or still waiting to be indexed?”
If they can’t see it:
“What’s the best channel to resend so it lands in the right place?”
What you’re trying to prevent:
resends, indexing delays, and “we never received it.”
Use this when the payer says “in process” or “pending.”
Script:
“Thank you — who owns it now? Which team or queue is it sitting in?
And what’s the expected timeframe for review so I can set the right follow-up date?”
If they won’t give a date:
“What’s the typical turnaround range — 3–5 business days, 7–10, or longer?”
What you’re trying to prevent:
random checking and repeated calls that don’t add new information.
Use this when you’re being told to call another department or try another queue.
Script:
“Before I call another number, can we confirm the correct destination?
Which team should own this right now, and can you transfer it or route it?
If not, what do I need to reference so the next rep can find it quickly?”
If they say “we can’t transfer”:
“Understood — can you document the account with the destination queue and note that it should be routed?”
What you’re trying to prevent:
accounts bouncing for weeks without a locked destination.
Scripts only matter if the record captures the output.
After each call, write a short note that reflects what you verified:
Verification Note format:
Example:
Proof: Docs visible (ref #23456)
Owner: Appeals Review Queue
Work date: 7–10 business days
Next step: Follow up 02/14; escalate if no assignment
That turns a call into a plan.
When there’s no system, follow-up feels personal.
People worry they’re “not saying the right thing.”
They worry they’ll miss a detail.
They worry leadership will ask for updates they can’t answer.
Scripts remove that pressure.
They give your team a steady backbone — especially on hard weeks.
They make follow-up feel calmer, clearer, and more fair across staff.
Start small.
Pick one payer or one work type (appeals, records, corrected claims).
Then do this for one week:
You’ll usually see improvement quickly:
fewer vague notes, fewer repeats, more accounts with owner-and-date.
Aged AR doesn’t need more noise.
It needs more certainty.
And certainty comes from asking the same good questions—every time.
At Zybex, we help teams build practical workflows like this—so aged AR stops depending on memory and starts moving with proof. If you want the future posts in this series, sign up with your email using the form below.
We’ll email you next steps shortly.
We’ll be in touch soon.