Website Notice: We are making improvements to our website layout to provide a better browsing experience. Some content may be updated during this process.
Why Pending Claims Can Be More Dangerous Than Denied Claims
A denied claim gets attention.
There is a reason code.
There is a problem to investigate.
And someone usually knows that action is required.
A pending claim can be different.
It may look like the payer is still working on it. The account remains open, the status does not appear final, and there may be no obvious denial demanding immediate attention.
So the team waits.
Then another week passes.
Then another.
Eventually, a claim that looked like it was simply “in process” has become old AR.
That is what makes pending claims an important area to watch.
A denial clearly tells the team that something happened.
A pending status may leave a much more difficult question:
Is the claim actually moving, or is it simply sitting?
Pending
See if the claim is still moving.
Status
Check what the payer is saying.
Age
Track how long nothing has changed.
Action
Confirm if the practice needs to respond.
Follow-Up
Review the claim at the right time.
Pending Does Not Always Mean Progress
There are legitimate reasons for a claim to remain pending while a payer completes processing.
The problem begins when “pending” becomes a reason to stop investigating the account.
Staff may see the status and assume no action is necessary.
But the claim may still require something.
For example, the payer may be:
- Reviewing additional information
- Waiting for documentation
- Verifying coverage or eligibility
- Reviewing authorization information
- Coordinating benefits with another payer
- Processing a corrected claim
- Completing another payer-specific review
Or the claim may simply have remained in the same status longer than expected.
This is why the word pending is not enough.
Staff need to understand what the status means for that particular claim and whether anything is required from the practice.
Check What the Payer Is Actually Saying
A pending claim should have more context than a status label.
When possible, staff should review the available payer information and determine:
Was the claim received?
Has it entered adjudication?
Is additional information required?
Has the status changed since the last review?
Is there an expected next step?
Does the practice need to do anything right now?
Healthcare claim-status transactions exist specifically to communicate information about the status of submitted claims. CMS, for example, supports the standard 276 claim-status request and 277 claim-status response for Medicare claims.
But obtaining a status is only part of the work.
The team still needs to understand what that status means for the account.
Pay Attention to How Long Nothing Has Changed
Age matters with pending claims.
A claim that has been pending for a short period may simply be moving through normal payer processing.
A claim that repeatedly shows the same status deserves a closer look.
Instead of reviewing only the age of the account, staff can also ask:
How long has the claim been in this exact status?
That is a different question.
Imagine that an account is 45 days old.
The claim may have moved through several stages during those 45 days, which shows activity.
Another claim may also be 45 days old but has displayed the same pending status for most of that time.
Those two accounts should not necessarily be viewed the same way.
The second claim may deserve more investigation precisely because very little appears to have changed.
Make Sure the Payer Is Not Waiting on the Practice
One of the risks with a pending account is assuming that the next action belongs entirely to the payer.
Sometimes it does.
Sometimes it does not.
The payer may be waiting for information that has not reached the right person inside the practice.
That could involve:
- Medical records
- Supporting documentation
- Authorization information
- Coordination of benefits information
- Corrected claim information
- Provider information
- Another response requested during review
If that request is buried in a portal, correspondence, account note, or another workflow, the billing team may continue seeing pending without realizing that the claim cannot move until the practice responds.
That turns waiting into avoidable AR aging.
The useful question becomes:
“Who is waiting on whom?”
If the payer is waiting on the practice, the account is not really waiting for payer processing anymore.
It is waiting for internal action.
Do Not Let “Pending” Automatically Delay the Next Review
Another problem occurs when every pending claim receives the same follow-up interval.
Someone checks the claim.
It still says pending.
Another follow-up date is entered.
The account disappears from attention until that date arrives.
Sometimes that is appropriate.
But repeated follow-up dates can also create the appearance that an account is being managed when very little is actually happening.
Before scheduling another review, staff should understand:
- What changed since the previous review
- Whether the payer gave a reason for the pending status
- Whether anything was requested
- Whether a processing timeframe was provided
- Whether the account has remained unchanged through several follow-ups
- Whether escalation or a different type of investigation is appropriate
The goal is not to call a payer unnecessarily.
It is to avoid turning “check again later” into the permanent strategy for the account.
A Pending Claim Can Affect More Than Insurance AR
As a pending claim gets older, other parts of the patient account may also remain unsettled.
Patient responsibility may not yet be final.
Secondary insurance may be unable to process.
Statements may need to wait.
Other account activity may depend on the primary payer completing its work.
That means one claim sitting in an uncertain status can delay several later steps.
This is another reason teams should avoid treating pending claims as passive accounts.
Even when no immediate action is required, the practice still needs a reliable way to know that the account remains under review and when it should be examined again.
Look for Payers and Claims That Stay Pending Repeatedly
One pending claim may not indicate anything unusual.
A pattern can be much more informative.
Practices can periodically ask:
Does one payer frequently leave claims pending longer than others?
Are certain procedures more likely to enter extended review?
Do pending claims frequently involve authorization?
Are documentation requests being discovered late?
Are the same types of accounts repeatedly receiving “check again later” follow-ups?
How many pending claims have shown no meaningful change since the previous review?
These questions can help distinguish normal processing time from recurring operational problems.
The purpose is not to treat every pending claim as an emergency.
It is to identify the ones that are quietly becoming old AR.
A Simple Pending Claim Review
When a claim remains pending, staff can use a short review:
Confirm that the payer actually has the claim and that it was not rejected earlier in the process.
Look beyond the word “pending” and review any available explanation.
Compare the current status with previous account activity.
Check for documentation, corrections, authorization information, or other requests.
Pay attention to inactivity, not only total account age.
Base the follow-up on the available payer information and circumstances rather than automatically repeating the same interval.
Look for patterns across payer, claim type, service, or workflow.
This review helps teams distinguish between a claim that is genuinely progressing and one that has quietly stopped moving.
Better Visibility Helps Teams See What Is Not Changing
Denied claims are visible because something clearly went wrong.
Pending claims can be harder because nothing may look obviously wrong yet.
That makes account history important.
Staff need to see when the claim was submitted, what status was previously received, what the payer said, whether anything was requested, what another employee already did, and how long the account has remained unchanged.
When those details are scattered across different systems, portals, notes, and follow-up lists, it becomes harder to recognize when a pending claim deserves more attention.
Zybex helps healthcare organizations manage the information and activity surrounding AR accounts so teams can better understand account history, previous actions, and what may still require attention.
The value is not simply knowing that a claim is pending.
It is helping staff recognize whether the account is actually progressing or simply continuing to carry the same status.
Find the Friction Behind the Account
Pending claims can reveal a form of operational friction that is easy to overlook.
Nothing appears dramatically wrong.
The claim has not necessarily been denied.
The balance has not disappeared.
The account simply remains there.
Can staff quickly determine how long the status has been unchanged?
Can they see what the payer said during the previous review?
Can they tell whether documentation was requested?
Can another employee understand why the team is waiting?
Can the practice identify which pending accounts are quietly becoming old AR?
If answering those questions requires repeated portal searches, rebuilding account history, or simply checking again because no one knows what else to do, the pending claim may be revealing more than a payer delay.
It may be revealing operational friction.
The Healthcare Operations Friction Assessment helps medical practices identify where information, processes, handoffs, and everyday account work may be creating unnecessary difficulty.
Take the Healthcare Operations Friction Assessment:
The Healthcare Operations Friction Toolkit can also help teams examine practical areas of their workflow and identify opportunities to make AR work more structured and manageable.
Because a denied claim tells the team that something needs attention.
A pending claim can be more difficult.
It can sit quietly while everyone assumes someone—or something—is still working on it.
In This Article
- 01 Pending
- 02 Status
- 03 Age
- 04 Action
- 05 Follow-Up
Related Post
Featured Resource
Healthcare Operations Friction Assessment
Healthcare Operations Friction Toolkit
Enter your email below to receive the toolkit.
Find the Friction Behind the Account
See where workflow friction may be making AR work harder than necessary.